“If
the Arab uprisings have demonstrated nothing else they have made this
clear. The United States and Europe,
their governments, and their intellectuals, continue to view the Arab world and
Muslim majority societies as former colonies, as historical (and financial)
debtor nations, as countries that must be kept in a state of ideological and
economic dependence in order to protect the vital interests of the North.” (Ramdan
2012: 133)
While reading these words in Ramdan’s Islam and the Arab Awakening, the image of a dog owner putting his
dog in the doghouse or cage after it started to misbehave popped into
mind. The West has this self-perceived
superiority over the Muslims and wants to demonstrate its dominance over them by
containing it so it will not act up and disobey again.
Well, like Ami mentioned in his post, this “point[s] to a
sociological and ideological hubris at the center of colonialism.” Yes, the West believes its intentions are in
the right place but trying to project what it judges to be for the best of the
people might just be counterproductive.
Already established beliefs, traditions, and perceptions will end up
clashing and producing chaos. I know
that when a person tries to force something upon me, my light and innocent
protests begin to grow into pure irritation, and then abrupt annoyance. Thus, the western countries attempting to
inflict its own structure onto the Muslim people in an effort to call order
will instead call rise to resistance and a string of frustration. It’s backwards.
Once again, the West is not trying to cause any trouble – it
is making an effort to lend a hand and help the people find a suitable state of
authority to abide by.
But sometimes, one size does not fit all.
On a
side note: I originally planned on returning tomorrow but my post-surgery
infection is taking longer than necessary to clear up so I am uncertain if I will
be able to make it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.