The study of aesthetics, according to the mythical Bharata
appears to be atypical from everything else we have studied. To further clarify,
it does not seem to focus on logic and social structure as much as it focuses
on emotion and the senses. Moreover, the Natyasastra’s Rasa constantly changes
in definition. However it is understood to be, it’s descriptions always stems
from being a mental state or an imitation of a mental state.
One thing I can relate to is how drama takes away the “I”. To
elaborate, while seeing and hearing Sita Sings the Blues, I did not experience
myself. Just like how I don’t pay attention to the nose on my face, I did not
pay attention to my position in the classroom. However, I was emotional toward
something that someone else, an animation, felt. (I was absorbing the story, I
did not relate to any of the characters.) On a related note, I am not sure what
becomes of the one who acts. Do they live as if the act is their world, or are
they consciously aware of their self?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.